Letters to the Editor

Letters: Poor growth strategy

There are many supporters for Summerland’s growth strategy which represents very good short-term thinking, as it allows a compact town with minimal infrastructure costs.

However, we should be thinking long-term (meaning 40 or 50 years) in which case this strategy is very poor as it assumes that we will always continue to import food.

For example, with droughts and depleting aquifers, I would not count on California continuing to export food. Therefore, we must save our prime agricultural land and densify our downtown core by eliminating barriers such as building height restrictions and infilling wherever possible.

George Brake

Summerland

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
 
MP REPORT: New regulations and legislation introduced
 
NATURE WISE: Environmental cost of holiday entertaining
Marilyn Manson coming to SOEC
 
City of Penticton investigating airport purchase
 
Houdini gives a hoot
Terrace to consider fulltime bylaw officer
 
NDP blasts lottery corporation spending
 
Site C dam construction to start next summer

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.