Tom Fletcher, in his column (Penticton Western News, Jan. 3, In 2018, ideology meets reality) both condemns and applauds the current Site C situation.
He is definitely for it, but claims “green-left technology, outside funded activism and bad science,” were the reason for “reality” to win out.
What “good” science would promote flooding so much quality agricultural land (needlessly), thereby helping to make us even more dependent on places such as Chile and California?
Joy Lang
Penticton