Malicious attitudes evident

I am concerned by opinions posted in two recent Friday editions of the Penticton Western News.

I am concerned by opinions posted in two recent Friday editions of the Penticton Western News. Both Mischa Popoff’s letter (“A painless death for Kyoto”) and Mark Walker’s column (“Other people’s money in short supply”) reveal a malicious attitude towards greens or environmentalists. Both pieces quite bluntly accuse those who express their concern for our planet’s health to have “socialist” or “communist” motives. For example, Popoff accuses people like Maurice Strong of being “social relativists” and of deciding “to just destroy Western economies to make everyone equal”. Walker claims that the greens were taken over by the “communist peaceniks”, and that “the green veil has been revealed as red”.

I identify with the green movement, but do not consider myself a socialist or communist. To me, it seems that the difference between greens, including myself, and the likes of Popoff and Walker is better described as long-term views versus short/middle-term views. Long-term viewers stress the health of our ecosystems upon which all people ultimately depend for our prosperity. Short/middle-term viewers stress the health of our current economic system upon which we rely for our personal and social well-being. Long-term viewers warn that the economic system that their political opponents want to protect creates social and ecological degradation and thus threatens the very foundations of our civilization. Short/middle-term viewers warn that subsidies and enviro-taxes meant to decrease our collective ecological impact threaten our Western economies and thus our prosperity.

Of course, both views are valuable as well as incomplete. We need short- and middle-term stability to effect long-term change. On the other hand, we have to accept the reality of ecological degradation. Even if you choose to doubt human-caused climate change, can anyone really deny that humans are slowly-but-surely spending Earth’s natural capital? Does anyone believe that there are no limits to what our Earth can supply? Does anyone doubt that some fish stocks have collapsed, that we are losing forests, that some aquifers and other freshwater sources are being depleted, that we are reaching the limits of agricultural productivity? These trends concern me, not because my neighbour drives a bigger car than I do, not because I like to hug trees or polar bears, but because I value my family’s health and prosperity, and Canada’s social and political stability. I propose that we try to agree on a course of action rather than vilify each other.

Arthur Bakx





Just Posted

Ranchers help grow PRH

Ranching family’s roots recognized through PRH donation

Video: UpriSingh rally in the South Okanagan

NDP leader Jagmeet Singh visited Penticton for the second time this year.

Oktoberfest kicks off new Beer Week

The 10th annual event ties into the new week-long celebration of craft beers.

Vees fall to Clippers by 4-1

It was a bit of a feeling out process through the opening 20 minutes between two teams

Rain in forecast for Okanagan-Shuswap region

Mixed bag of clouds, sun and showers forecast for the week ahead

Summerland council agrees to 30-year lease with steam railway

Tourist train has been operating as an attraction in Summerland since 1995

Speeding a concern on Summerland streets

Police observe fast motorists in town and on Highway 97

Greta Thunberg meets with First Nations chief in Fort McMurray

Thunberg has turned her protest against climate change into a global movement

Athletes of the Week: Aurora Goerlitz and Sadie Sussey

The Penticton Christian School students demonstrate there’s nothing wrong with a little horseplay

Letter: Too many going without

The problem of poverty needs to be fixed fast

Canucks hang on for 3-2 win over Rangers in New York

Vancouver scores three times in first period

Most Read